Michigan's Rafaeli v. Oakland County Aftermath: Excess Proceeds Claims Guide

Understanding the Landmark Decision: Rafaeli v. Oakland County

In July 2020, the Michigan Supreme Court delivered a groundbreaking ruling in Rafaeli, LLC v. Oakland County. The case originated from a startling fact pattern: Uri Rafaeli owed $8.41 in unpaid interest on a property tax debt. Oakland County foreclosed on the residential property, sold it at a tax auction for $24,500, and retained the entire surplus proceeds, leaving Rafaeli with nothing.

The state's highest court determined that a property owner's equity interest in real estate is a protected property right under Article X, Section 2 of the Michigan Constitution. When a foreclosing governmental unit (FGU) sells foreclosed property for more than the tax debt, interest, penalties, and fees owed, retaining the surplus constitutes an unconstitutional taking without just compensation.

This ruling dismantled decades of local government practice in Michigan, where counties routinely absorbed tax-auction windfalls into their general funds. The decision sparked immediate reform across the state, fundamentally shifting how excess proceeds from tax foreclosures are handled.

Legislative Response: Public Act 256 and MCL 211.78t

To establish a structured administrative and judicial framework following Rafaeli, the Michigan Legislature passed Public Act 256 of 2020. This legislation amended the General Property Tax Act (GPTA) by creating Section 211.78t (MCL 211.78t).

MCL 211.78t sets forth explicit procedural steps that former property owners, lienholders, and interest holders must follow to claim remaining proceeds after a tax foreclosure sale. Importantly, the statute established strict, non-negotiable statutory deadlines, placing the burden on claimants to initiate their recovery proactively.

Under MCL 211.78t, surplus funds are defined as the amount realized from the foreclosure sale exceeding the total legal tax delinquent debt, interest, penalties, and allowable fees incurred by the foreclosing entity.

Step-by-Step Breakdown of the Michigan Claim Process

Navigating the recovery of tax sale surplus funds in Michigan requires strict adherence to statutory timelines. Failing to meet these statutory cutoff dates can permanently bar a claimant from recovering funds.

1. Submission of Form 5743

A claimant must file State Tax Commission Form 5743, officially titled the "Notice of Intention to Claim Interest in Foreclosing Governmental Unit's Remaining Proceeds."

• Deadline: Must be delivered to the FGU by July 1 immediately preceding the tax foreclosure sale.
• Requirements: The form must be notarized and specify the claimant's legal interest in the foreclosed property.

2. Foreclosure Sale Execution

The FGU conducts the tax foreclosure auction, typically occurring between July and October. The property is sold to the highest bidder. If the property does not sell, or sells for less than the debt, no surplus proceeds exist to claim.

3. FGU Notification of Remaining Proceeds

By January 31 of the year following the tax sale, the FGU must send a notice to all eligible claimants who timely submitted Form 5743. This notice details:

• Whether surplus proceeds were realized from the sale.
• The total amount of the remaining proceeds.
• The cost breakdown of taxes, interest, penalties, and expenses deducted by the FGU.

4. Motion in Circuit Court

To receive distribution of the funds, the claimant must file a civil motion in the circuit court where the foreclosure judgment was entered.

• Deadline: The motion must be filed between February 1 and May 15 of the year following the foreclosure sale.
• Process: The court schedules a hearing to evaluate competing claims and determine final payouts.

Priority of Claims and Eligible Claimants

When multiple parties claim an interest in the surplus proceeds of a single property, Michigan law establishes a clear priority order to determine distribution. Circuit court judges follow these statutory priorities when issuing distribution orders:

1. Senior Lienholders: Mortgage holders, judgment lienholders, and recorded security interest holders whose interests were extinguished by the foreclosure.
2. Junior Lienholders: Secondary lienholders or subordinate encumbrancers.
3. Former Record Title Holders: The fee simple owner or deed holder at the time of the foreclosure judgment.
4. Other Interest Holders: Parties holding verifiable legal rights or unrecorded equitable interests acknowledged by the court.

If the remaining proceeds are insufficient to satisfy senior liens, junior lienholders and former fee title owners will receive no payout.

Retroactivity and Subsequent Case Law Developments

A major point of contention following Rafaeli was whether the ruling applied retroactively to tax sales conducted before July 2020. The Michigan Supreme Court partially addressed this in subsequent decisions, including Proctor v. Saginaw County.

The judiciary affirmed that individuals whose properties were foreclosed and sold prior to the Rafaeli ruling could pursue claims, provided their claims fell within applicable statutes of limitations and were not barred by previous final court decisions.

Furthermore, the legal landscape expanded nationally when the United States Supreme Court decided Tyler v. Hennepin County in May 2023. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that retaining tax foreclosure surplus equity violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This federal ruling reaffirmed the principles laid down in Rafaeli, solidifying property owners' constitutional rights to excess equity across all states.

Key Summary of Deadlines for Michigan Claimants

For property owners and creditors managing potential tax surplus recoveries in Michigan, keeping track of exact dates is essential:

• July 1 (Year of Sale): Deadline to file Form 5743 with the FGU.
• July - October (Year of Sale): Foreclosure sales conducted by counties.
• January 31 (Year After Sale): FGU issues notice of excess proceeds to Form 5743 applicants.
• May 15 (Year After Sale): Final deadline to file a circuit court motion for fund distribution.

Essential Considerations for Foreclosure Surplus Recovery

While Michigan's statutory process provides clarity, property owners should remain aware of potential challenges. Local FGUs strictly enforce filing deadlines, and missed paperwork generally results in forfeiture of remaining funds to the county. Additionally, legal representation may be necessary when priority disputes arise between lenders, mechanics' lienholders, and former homeowners.

---

Disclaimer: This article is intended solely for general informational and educational purposes and does not constitute formal legal advice. Tax foreclosure laws, procedural rules, and court deadlines vary significantly by jurisdiction and are subject to legislative updates. If you are seeking recovery of tax sale excess proceeds, consult a licensed attorney in your state.